No your wrong. We aren?t even allowed to mention anything about him not even his firmware 126.96.36.199. By the looks of it?s taboo.
I don?t think that a simple miss understanding could cause this. I think it?s more personal.
Because the server has made it pretty clear that they didn't want to contribute to the confusion of differing firmware versions for new users that projects like Rogue uses.
However, you're mistaken if you think it's a 'personal' thing. I
don't like the idea, and have made it pretty clear what my
thoughts were on the whole RG-350 firmware situation in the light of Pcercuei's upcoming developments soon to overshadow everything else being done now. But my thoughts, or that of any of the other individuals pictured (that you seem to be adding to some kind of hitlist? Why leave their names out in the open?) don't represent everyone, nor Dingoonity here. They were simply doing their part to respect the other moderators and likeminded devs who don't want to be held responsible for third-party distros they haven't overseen; heaven forbid that users run into issues or the like.
Everything in the latter screenshots afterwards is their own opinions without prior knowledge of the firmware debacle. That's about as unbiased as you can be without not knowing what an Anbernic is.
What isn't pictured: me and another user telling you not to talk about Rogue, and you continuing to argue its superiority while we reiterate what's been said previously.
However, and forgive me for being late to the discussion, but I must ask; why bring this up here
of all places? That alone would be spreading FUD for all involved parties, which I wouldn't even want to wish upon the likes of Rogue's developer themselves, let alone me or anyone else being namedropped. Can we. . . not?