Author Topic: Nintendo Switch  (Read 7752 times)

NTMBK

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2016, 09:43:51 am »
You know what I really want from this? Google Chrome. If it has a proper, state of the art, up-to-date web browser, and not some crummy Nintendo special, then I can actually use this to replace my tablet.

SONY (OP)

  • ***
  • Posts: 1382
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2016, 09:55:38 am »
Yeah, I love Chrome too.

1) How long does the battery last in the tablet when gaming with it
It isn't known yet. More details will be revealed closer to release.

2) What happens to the whole console if you damage the tablet portion, is the whole thing then cactus. Seems so, given Nintendo said the main HW is in the tablet bit and the dock is primarily for connectivity
You're right, but that should be a given. Also, Nintendo consoles are tough as bricks - the 3DS can survive 30 foot drops with only scratches.

3) Is there a 3DS successor planned , if so , how will the switch effect sales of it. Or is the switch meant as a console and 3DS replacement
As it seems right now, this isn't Nintendo's next-gen handheld. With their current partnerships, it's possible they'll move either consolidate some of their handheld divisions into the Switch, and some will develop games and accessories for smartphones (as done with the partnership with Apple).

4) When you remove the controller portions from the tablet, like in the ad when he is on the plane. Unless you also carry the central controller connector, the controller must be used as two halfs. Needing a central connector for the controller IMO is kind of crap, it affects portability by needing to carry it around. More importantly , its a pain in the ass to have to dig it out of your bag and setup the controller.
It probably won't be necessary. The centerpiece is more comfortable, granted, but anyone who has used the Wiimote + Nunchuck can tell you that that control scheme is totally viable.

5)  The more I think about this, the less Im feeling for it. Look at the dpad, or should I say lack of, it's just 4 game buttons . I can see why they did this (so both sides of the controller are equal and be used by two players), but it's still bad.
I don't really agree, seeing that even 2D platformers use the analogs nowadays over the d-pad (Guacamelee! comes to mind), and while I do like playing with the d-pad, it's not a central feature anymore. Especially if Nintendo doesn't fuck up and brings back the GameCube analogs, with their hexagonal edges that let you execute PERFECT diagonals, horizontals and verticals.

6) Apparently the pro controller will have a proper dpad from what i've heard, if so, not sure how devs would deal with the difference . Are they really going to develop a game that works better with a controller that's optional - by that I mean, make use of diagonal movement which is achievable on the pro controller and not the standard.
Again, not an issue if you use the analogs as the main way to control your character. The d-pad is relegated to secondary control structures, quickswitch and button replacement nowadays. This is especially true when you separate the two Joy Cons and use one of them horizontally - the analog stick is your d-pad in this weird SNES controller.

How is that innovative.
1. It lets you play current-gen console games on the go.
2. It lets you play console games without a TV.
3. It has built-in support for multiplayer WITHOUT any added accessories.
4. It uses an nVidia GPU in a console.
5. For Nintendo, the control scheme is actually sane for the first time since the GameCube.
6. Multiplayer will have more simplistic, SNES-like controls, while the singleplayer will have a full control scheme - letting even less experienced players enjoy the game without having all of its complexity, without actually handicapping the core experience. (This is ingenious, if it actually works)
7. It isn't the GPD Win and screws over IGG backers. ;)

EDIT: By the way, if anyone wonders why am I supporting it so much aside from just being hyped, it's because of the recent failures of Nintendo - the Wii which failed hardcore gamers, and the Wii U. Both of those failed because they were too esoteric and weak to develop games for, and now Nintendo turns around and develops something that's both innovative and has all the right conservative aspects at the same time.
But still, it is haunted by the reputation of the past systems, leading to videos like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SaQ9kJV8w0
Which say "Nintendo lied!" when they promised 3rd party support, which is not only out of their control, the supposed games they promised were by studios that went bankrupt midway through development (Metro: Last Light, 4A Games) or by publishers powerful enough to do whatever they wanted, and they didn't want to develop for a system with a smaller audience (Ubisoft and EA, for example).
So I'm going to support this until it's released and then it can prove itself to be worth it. That way we have a good chance to get a system that isn't filled with shovelware (Wii) or is barren (Wii U), and that is actually good on its own right too.

Brilliant! Once again, I 100% agree with everything that you've said.
SONY PS3
SONY PS4 Slim
SONY PS4 Pro

GPD XD

vcoleiro1

  • ***
  • Posts: 1578
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #32 on: October 21, 2016, 11:06:34 am »
It's a tablet, you drop it, it breaks.  What then.

No point saying Nintendo consoles in the past have been tough.  This isn't that anymore.   This thing has a large (7 inch?) screen.  You drop that on the screen , it will likely break.

skelton

  • *****
  • Posts: 6403
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2016, 11:39:46 am »
For me the size is too big to be considered a handheld, My maximum size for a handheld is Psvita or 3dsXL. I have a shield tablet +ipega and it's a monster to use and uncofortable, like 7 inch android devices (t least for me). Also, the lack of dpad may not be a problem for some people, but it is for me. Yeah, some indie games like Guacamalee can be controlled with analogs, but I prefer a proper good dpad.
Also, the comparison with GPD WIN is strange, they are completely different devices. One is focused in emulators and windows huge catalogue. Switch is a close system so no emulators, and mainly focused on nintendo games which are not much of my interest. GPD WIN and Switch have a different target., I understand nintendo fans buy their new device too. But for me 3ds was a big dissapointment (I rarely use it), and WII and WIIU were quite dissapointing too. The use of ARM with the tegra X1 can be a handicap for third party games, like it happened with WiiU and their powerPC, which supposedly was going to have a good third party support, and lives thanks to nintendo games, but that's it.

I personally won't buy it, unless until a year or so and I can see how it works, and the game catalogue it has. But I see it more as a home console that as a handheld device. I would have preferred a successor of 3ds with better specs but keeping portability.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2016, 11:43:58 am by skelton »
Retired

davidgilmour

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2016, 12:19:09 pm »
It's a tablet, you drop it, it breaks.  What then.

No point saying Nintendo consoles in the past have been tough.  This isn't that anymore.   This thing has a large (7 inch?) screen.  You drop that on the screen , it will likely break.
Yeah, normally Nintendo is idiot proof. This one won't be lol.

SONY (OP)

  • ***
  • Posts: 1382
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #35 on: October 21, 2016, 01:20:12 pm »
Which one is more powerful in terms of GPU power... nVIDIA Shield console or Nintendo Switch?
SONY PS3
SONY PS4 Slim
SONY PS4 Pro

GPD XD

vcoleiro1

  • ***
  • Posts: 1578
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #36 on: October 21, 2016, 01:26:14 pm »
@SONY
No one will know that until they release the specs of the Switch.


I got to tell you, I'm not feeling it for the Switch.    It seems to me, to be nothing more than a gaming tablet that we are all use to .   Hardly innovative.   You know now what happened with Nividia Shield portable and tablet plans.  yep , they  got shelved for the Switch.

This isn't much more than a Nintendo ecosystem driven Nvidia Shield Tablet 2 with an Ipega controller.   

The Wii UI got hate because it was a under powered console cpompared to the others.  This will still be that despite a special launch years later that you would have thought addressed that issue.  You might say, oh but it's innovative.  My response, how is a Shield 2 tablet with detachable controller (ala Ipega 9023 )  innovative .   

Two player gaming with those crappy half controllers, yeah , no thanks

Not feeling it.  The others still look better ie the Xbox Scorpio and PS4 Pro
« Last Edit: October 21, 2016, 01:36:44 pm by vcoleiro1 »

skelton

  • *****
  • Posts: 6403
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2016, 01:52:46 pm »
Which one is more powerful in terms of GPU power... nVIDIA Shield console or Nintendo Switch?

If the Switch comes with Tegra X1 as rumoured then it is similar to shield TV, perhaps slightly underclocked to get better battery. tegra X1 is quite hot, in fact in shield TV Box comes with a fan.
Retired

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2016, 05:40:21 pm »
It's a tablet, you drop it, it breaks.  What then.

No point saying Nintendo consoles in the past have been tough.  This isn't that anymore.   This thing has a large (7 inch?) screen.  You drop that on the screen , it will likely break.
Have you heard of Gorilla Glass? It's scalable to 7'' as shown by devices such as nVidia Shield Tablet. The screen is a non-issue seeing both companies who make the Switch, and if the other parts are as tough as it is, it can be very resilient. The real question is whether it has any moving parts inside of it, although the GameCube could also survive a 30 foot drop and it had a disc reader so I don't know.
We'll know more after it's released of course, but even as it stands right now the industry standard is to have resilient devices with Gorilla Glass and IP rating of 68, so assuming otherwise is uncalled for.

Yeah, some indie games like Guacamalee can be controlled with analogs, but I prefer a proper good dpad.
No, Guacamelee! has to be controlled via analogs because otherwise dodging and activating overdrive mode becomes a pain in the ass. Most of the games nowadays are built around analogs, and I agree that I would like a d-pad for some games - but it's not a must have.
Also, Nintendo has peripherals up the wazoo, with the Switch Pro controller already seen in the video and (like any other console) will have 3rd party controllers, some with d-pads. This might cost your another $20 if they don't ship the Pro controller with it, but it's a very solvable issue.

Also, the comparison with GPD WIN is strange, they are completely different devices.
Dude, I was kidding. I even put a wink emoji there, and I never use emojis.

This isn't much more than a Nintendo ecosystem driven Nvidia Shield Tablet 2 with an Ipega controller.   
That's like saying that the PS4 and the XB1 are just PCs with extreme limitations imposed on their content, which is true. So what? It innovates through integrating all of the concepts that were niche up to this point to a powerful big-name console. It's not like these concepts were bad from the get go, they just had very shitty implementations.

The Wii UI got hate because it was a under powered console cpompared to the others.  This will still be that despite a special launch years later that you would have thought addressed that issue.  You might say, oh but it's innovative.  My response, how is a Shield 2 tablet with detachable controller (ala Ipega 9023 )  innovative .
No, the Wii U got hate because its clunky control scheme that made developers unwanting to develop special version just for it. Power isn't a factor - it wasn't with the Wii which had a shit load of games, and it wasn't with the Wii U where most games were under 4GB but had to be shipped on a BluRay disc because that was the industry standard. Power is only at play if you're striving for realism and have no art design for your game, which might be the case for games like NBA 2kYEAR and the Call of Duty games, but they've already shown one of those running well on it.

LordDavon

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #39 on: October 21, 2016, 06:27:49 pm »
It's a tablet, you drop it, it breaks.  What then.

No point saying Nintendo consoles in the past have been tough.  This isn't that anymore.   This thing has a large (7 inch?) screen.  You drop that on the screen , it will likely break.
I respect your opinion.  Please don't take this the wrong way.  I'm just not sure I get this.  This could be said for any tablet, and this is really just a tablet with a dock and controller.

I'm seeing this as a $400 machine, which is half the cost of my iPad Air 2 was when it was new.  My Pixel C was $549, and my Shield Tablet was $439 with all the extras when new.  Heck, I even dropped the $300 on the S192 K1.  If they drop, I take them to get the glass replaced.  As long as the digitizer isn't damaged, it doesn't cost more than $80.  If it is, I'm looking at $100 - $200.  My iPad 3 was $140 with the digitizer.

They will make cases for this, and protective sleeves for carrying them.  There looked to be some room in the dock for this to have at least a smart cover.

It's a tablet.  And like any tablet, they can break.  It really doesn't stop the tens of millions high end tablet sales that happen every month.

LordDavon

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2016, 06:30:34 pm »
If the Switch comes with Tegra X1 as rumoured then it is similar to shield TV, perhaps slightly underclocked to get better battery. tegra X1 is quite hot, in fact in shield TV Box comes with a fan.

Nvidia said it is a custom chip.  It may be an X1 with X2 featuers.  I'm not sure.  I've got the X1 in my Pixel C.  It does run a little lower than the Shield TV.  I don't think it has a fan and while it gets hot, it is never too hot.

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2016/10/20/nintendo-switch/?__prclt=deVBN1ot

skelton

  • *****
  • Posts: 6403
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2016, 08:11:22 pm »
Yeah, because is a tablet. In the TV the fan is posssible because there is no need to worry for battery time. My guess is that it will be a customized version of X1, since they haven't announced a x2. Unless they want a poor battery life, like it happened with shiield tablet.
Retired

vcoleiro1

  • ***
  • Posts: 1578
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2016, 09:27:07 pm »
@LordDavon


The point I was making is that since it is a tablet, people will be using it occassionally as a mobile gaming device.   Unlike a traditional console which people have pointed out have been very robust in the past.  The Switch is not robust

Imagine if the PS4 was a little smaller had controllers attached and a big glass screen .  And you could walk around with it.   Put it in the hands of young boys that love to throw controllers around and do what boys do.  See were I'm going with this.

@Made in China

Yes I'm aware it will probably use Gorilla Glass, And?   . It will still break if you drop it,  Gorilla Glass is not magic

As for the PS4 and Xbox being a limited PC, yep agree.  And I agree, they are not innovative, they rely on power and just deliver to gaming basics.   The Switch because it wasn't going to meet them power wise, was said to be innovative. Again, how is a gaming tablet innovative.  It's not.  The only innovative thing is possibly the removable controller which can be used by two people.  But as I said, , IMO, that is more down side for the trade offs than pluses

Frankly, I thought they would go down the VR path or something. But it looks like they didn't even pack enough power for that to be an accessory option later on.   Could be wrong, hopefuilly I am, because that would really suck.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2016, 10:05:46 pm by vcoleiro1 »

LordDavon

Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #43 on: October 21, 2016, 09:37:57 pm »
@LordDavon
The point I was making is that since it is a tablet, people will be using it occassionally as a mobile gaming device.   Unlike a traditional console which people have pointed out have been very robust in the past.  The Switch is not robust

Imagine if the PS4 was a little smaller had controllers attached and a big glass screen .  And you could walk around with it.   Put it in the hands of young boys that love to throw controllers around and do what boys do.  See were I'm going with this.
I get where we aren't seeing this the same way.  In the video, I really didn't see many kids.  I don't see Nintendo marketing this to kids.  It is being marked toward young adults and adults.  So, I see it more of a tablet/gaming system for people like the people in this forum.  We are all ages, but there aren't any kids, that I know of.

I see where you are seeing this more like the Wii.  Where kids would be playing it as well as the adults.  I can see your perspective.  I have a 7 month old son, 10 year old step-daughter, 16 year old daughter and 21 year old daughter.  I'd let the 16 year old or 21 year old use it in tablet mode, but the other two aren't getting near the tablet...  They can play it on the TV, if I let them even play it. :-)

vcoleiro1

  • ***
  • Posts: 1578
Re: Nintendo Switch
« Reply #44 on: October 21, 2016, 09:48:16 pm »
Nintendos consoles have always traditionally attracted a younger market than the other two, simply because of the type of games on them.   And even though a lot of adults play it, enough young teens will be playing it to be an issue if it's not robust.   It's not a question of generalisation.

According to this poll 58% of users of the Wii U were under 24 with 19% in the 12-18year range

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/631516-wii-u/65110399


But lets be honest here, a number of adults also trash there consoles around. Throwing controllers etc. Even accidental drops are a problem here.   


The point being, this isn't going to be as safe from breakage as a general console that is built like a tank and sits near the TV and doesn't move.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2016, 10:22:17 pm by vcoleiro1 »

 

Post a new topic